Much is still planned to happen downtown. The latest subject for development are proposals by Peach Property and The Alexander Company. The Peach proposal shown here is modern and more attractive, but destroys the beautiful tile adorned arcade that Melody Peters did back the 80’s. It is built from bricks that came out of the old Tucson Livery Building that Steve Leal lobbied to save back in his ponytail days. He managed to save the bricks. You can view both proposasl in the the links below. The PDF’s are large so allow some time. Peach Proposal (PDF): Peach / Alexander Proposal (PDF): Alexander / Daily Star Article: Hotel, homes, stores: Developers reveal downtown Tucson proposals.
Archive for the ‘Infill’ Category
Downtown Tucson Proposals
Posted in Infill on August 19, 2015| Leave a Comment »
An Emerging Voice in Core Tucson
Posted in Infill, On-going Action on June 15, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Since the real estate crash more than 500 million dollars has poured in the core of Tucson fueled by commercial incentives like the Infill Incentive District (IID). Now, core residents are concerned about impact and would like to see a different kind of incentive for infill and edge development that serves to stabilize and not harm their neighborhoods. They would also like their own brand of incentives. Here’s what’s happenings:
July 22, DSC, basement Room C @ 6:00PM. 3rd Planning Commission IID Subcommittee to revise the Infill Incentive District. This deals with concerns of impact to neighborhoods from infill development. A 4th meeting is tentatively scheduled for September 9th.
July 13, Ward 6 office, 9AM to 12PM. The Neighborhood Infill Coalition (NIC) is hosting the 2nd neighborhood workshop to seek consensus for neighborhood unity. Attending will be neighborhood coalitions, leaders and residents. This follows the 2012 neighborhood symposium, and 3 subsequent resident-staff discussions.
Transitions and Synergy
Posted in Ideas, Infill on May 30, 2013| 1 Comment »
CORE BaNC (Core Barrio and Neighborhood Coalition) hosted a public forum on the Infill Incentive District Overlay at the Ward 6 office on May 28th. Adam Smith crafted a great response to a set of questions given before hand. The IID has only had 10 projects as of May 2013. Some are enormous and a majority are more inconsequential. A resonating factor that has neighborhoods wanting to opt their boundaries out of the district focuses on perceived failures in transitioning from large projects to a sensitive neighborhood context. If there is one factor that will make or break the IID concept, it is these transitions. (more…)
Smarter Smart Growth
Posted in Infill on May 29, 2013| Leave a Comment »
“Projects are…dashing existing neighborhood character under the banners of smart growth or transit oriented development…they fail in many of the finer points of smart growth… UrbDeZine…read more in 10 Rules for Smarter Smart Growth link by J. Hall
Should the Neighborhoods back the Main Gate project?
Posted in Conversations, Infill, Main Gate UOD, Modern Street Car on April 4, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Click here to read: Neighborhood association ought to back Main Gate project, by Robert Lanning, Architect. Published by the Daily Star. Here are some other points to consider: An edge / transition strategy is necessary. It is missing. One way it can happen is with a sub-regional downtown / U of A master plan that outlines what is coming so neighborhoods know what kind of final input they need to be prepared to engage in. The MGD skirts this. It is a fast track style re-zoning which is developer driven. If the project is like the $35 million dollar“Vue on Apache” in Tempe, Neighborhoods might have reservations. Not only is neighborhood input necessary in driving our best urban planning but to imply neighborhoods can not be part of a plan omits a key part of the picture. Watching the frustration of developers and neighborhoods year after year speaks for itself. Many agree that the transition is or should be the stretch of property just east of Euclid, but what does it look like? Are there plazas, hard-scape, sidewalks, trees and base development of low masses, including some of the fine historic structures creating the idea of being walkable and pedestrian friendly. A good transition insures this and when you look at historical structures that might be part of this, you have to see beyond the weeds. Map courtesty of WUNA.
The Streetcar, Intelligent Infill and Livability
Posted in Infill, Main Gate UOD, Modern Street Car on March 30, 2012| 2 Comments »
The Arizona Daily Star published a piece by the Dean of the College of Architecture, Janice Cervilli. The Dean sees this as positive for not only development, but for the community. What do neighborhoods think? Check out the Dean’s point of view on a dicey subject in the Modern Streetcar, Intelligent Infill can Make Tucson a More Livable City.
Power Shifts at City Hall
Posted in Infill, Politics and Editorials on September 10, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Please click on this title to view article “Power Shifts at City Hall“.