CORE BaNC (Core Barrio and Neighborhood Coalition) hosted a public forum on the Infill Incentive District Overlay at the Ward 6 office on May 28th. Adam Smith crafted a great response to a set of questions given before hand. The IID has only had 10 projects as of May 2013. Some are enormous and a majority are more inconsequential. A resonating factor that has neighborhoods wanting to opt their boundaries out of the district focuses on perceived failures in transitioning from large projects to a sensitive neighborhood context. If there is one factor that will make or break the IID concept, it is these transitions. (more…)
Archive for May, 2013
Transitions and Synergy
Posted in Ideas, Infill on May 30, 2013| 1 Comment »
Smarter Smart Growth
Posted in Infill on May 29, 2013| Leave a Comment »
“Projects are…dashing existing neighborhood character under the banners of smart growth or transit oriented development…they fail in many of the finer points of smart growth… UrbDeZine…read more in 10 Rules for Smarter Smart Growth link by J. Hall
Core Neighborhoods; Looking for a Voice
Posted in Edges and Overlays, Ideas, Infill on May 29, 2013| 1 Comment »
A 3rd city-neighborhoods meeting at the Community Resource Campus on May 6th, 2013 ended on a low note. Neighborhood leaders grilled staff with questions intended to bolster their voice in the planning process. These meetings originated with Pro Neighborhood’s final 2012 funded project; a year-long symposium of process exploration hosted by Jefferson Park NHA. View their White Paper. Q@A was directed to staff comprising four topics; neighborhood input, neighborhood support, transparency and new student housing projects. The sticking point was “neighborhood input”. Staff sounded stuck in a familiar box and neighborhood leaders wanted ideas. So, as the inquiry moves forward later in the Summer, the focus will be on how to push staff outside the proverbial box.
Two more things to think about are Plan Tucson and a new impact fee program. Plan Tucson is completing it’s public process. Read chapter 4, planning implementation. It mandates new specific plan updates of area and neighborhood plans. The assistant city manager has used the term “village plans”. These can consolidate neighborhood plans. Its a good thing only if neighborhood leaders are deep in the process.
Look for a new impact fee program. Regarding SB1525, the City must re-write their impact fee program allocation to be more specific to benefit districts with tighter use criteria. There is a chance that may work for neighborhoods, but it is another process that needs neighborhood advocacy. A smarter impact fee structure coupled with a proactive investment strategy is another possibility in planning that could deal with transitions in high impact areas between mega dorms and neighborhoods.
